Guest Post: Interpreting Interactions in Multilevel Models
29 Oct 2019This is a guest post by Jeremy Haynes, a doctoral student at Utah State University.
Contents
- Fitting Model and Specifying Simple Intercepts and Simple Slopes
- Methods of Probing Interactions (Preacher et al., 2006)
Fitting Model and Specifying Simple Intercepts and Simple Slopes
Model 1 | ||
---|---|---|
(Intercept) | -1.21*** | |
(0.27) | ||
sexgirl | 1.24*** | |
(0.04) | ||
extrav | 0.80*** | |
(0.04) | ||
texp | 0.23*** | |
(0.02) | ||
extrav:texp | -0.02*** | |
(0.00) | ||
AIC | 4798.45 | |
BIC | 4848.86 | |
Log Likelihood | -2390.23 | |
Num. obs. | 2000 | |
Num. groups: class | 100 | |
Var: class (Intercept) | 0.48 | |
Var: class extrav | 0.01 | |
Cov: class (Intercept) extrav | -0.03 | |
Var: Residual | 0.55 | |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 |
-
Write out model equation yi**j = γ00 + γ10Xi**j + γ20Xi**j + γ01Zj + γ21Xi**jZj + μ0j + μ2j + ei**j
-
Separate fixed effects from random effects yi**j = (γ00 + γ10Xi**j + γ20Xi**j + γ01Zj + γ21Xi**jZj) + (μ0j + μ2j + ei**j)
-
Derive prediction equation E[y|X, Z] = γ̂00 + γ̂10Xi**j + γ̂20Xi**j + γ̂01Zj + γ̂21Xi**jZj
-
Separate simple intercept from simple slope - this indirectly defines the focal predictor and moderator E[y|X, Z] = (γ̂00 + γ̂10Xi**j + γ̂20Xi**j) + (γ̂01Zj + γ̂21Xi**jZj)
-
Formally define focal predictor (Level 2: Z) and moderator (Level 1: X) E[y|X, Z] = (γ̂00 + γ̂10Xi**j + γ̂20Xi**j) + (γ̂01 + γ̂21Xi**j)Zj
-
Define simple intercept (ω0) and simple slope (ω1) ω0 = γ̂00 + γ̂10Xi**j + γ̂20Xi**j
ω1 = γ̂01 + γ̂21Xi**j
Methods of Probing Interactions (Preacher et al., 2006)
Simple Slopes Technique
- Specify conditional values of X (EXT) to evaluate significance for simple slope of y regressed on Z (TEXP)
- For continuous variables, this requires the “pick-a-point” method (Rogosa, 1980)
- First, I get some descriptives and will use the mean, +1 SD, and -1 SD (Cohen & Cohen, 1983)
- Values of 3.953, 5.215, and 6.477 for X
ω1 = γ̂01 + γ̂21Xi**j
Statistic | N | Mean | St. Dev. | Min | Pctl(25) | Pctl(75) | Max |
extrav | 2,000 | 5.215 | 1.262 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 10 |
- Calculate standard error of ω̂1
- Variance of ω̂1
var(ω̂1 | z) = var(γ̂01) + 2Xcov*(*γ̂*01, *γ̂*21) + *X*2*va**r(γ̂21) |
- Covariance matrix
## 5 x 5 Matrix of class "dpoMatrix"
## (Intercept) sexgirl extrav texp extrav:texp
## (Intercept) 7.392993e-02 1.764158e-05 -9.462046e-03 -4.187639e-03 5.370955e-04
## sexgirl 1.764158e-05 1.312796e-03 -9.458320e-05 -2.852607e-05 3.075874e-06
## extrav -9.462046e-03 -9.458320e-05 1.609389e-03 5.400536e-04 -9.232641e-05
## texp -4.187639e-03 -2.852607e-05 5.400536e-04 2.824846e-04 -3.686219e-05
## extrav:texp 5.370955e-04 3.075874e-06 -9.232641e-05 -3.686219e-05 6.526482e-06
- Calculate SE of ω̂1 for each value of X
- Form critical ratios for each value of X
- Calculate d**f and critical t-values
-
Degrees of freedom = N − p − 1
-
Critical t-values
- Determine significance
- If any of the t-values are above or below ± t-crit, respectively, then the simple slope of the focal predictor (Z) is significant at that conditional value of X
## [1] "t-crit: -1.96116040314397" "t-crit: 1.96116040314397"
## [1] "t-value for lower conditional value: 22.5300221770147"
## [1] "t-value for middle conditional value: 23.5026768695656"
## [1] "t-value for upper conditional value: 24.5447253519584"
- Plot that S**t
- Calculating predicted values
- Plot
Conclusion: The slope of teacher experience is significantly different from 0 at 1 SD of the mean and at the mean of extraversion.
Johnson-Neyman Technique
- Start with the t-statistic
Expand
\[\\pm t = \\frac{(\\hat\\gamma\_{01} + \\hat\\gamma\_{21}X)}{var(\\hat\\gamma\_{01}) + 2Xcov(\\hat\\gamma\_{01}, \\hat\\gamma\_{21}) + X^2 var(\\hat\\gamma\_{21})}\]- Find values of X that solve for t
- X can be found by solving the following quadratic (Carden, Holtzman, Strube, 2017):
where
a = tα/22Var(γ̂21) − γ̂32,
b = 2tα/22Cov(γ̂1, γ̂21) − 2γ̂1γ̂21,
c = tα/22Var(γ̂1) − γ̂12
The regions of significance for the slope of teacher experience, conditioned on extraversion are significant beyond 29.1564177269881 and 37.4077675641277 points of extraversion. This is outside the range of extraversion; therefore, the slope of teacher experience is significantly different from 0 at all values of extraversion.
- Plotting
- Calculating estimates of the slope for teacher experience as a function of extraversion